Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond to Bushel per Hours Converter — cm3/ms to bu/h
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) to Bushel per Hours (bu/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per millisecond = 102.1593357 bushel per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond to Bushel per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.001 / 9.7886306e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond to Bushel per Hours
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond and Bushel per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per hours = cubic centimeters per millisecond × 102.15933573
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, and 1 bushel per hours equals 0.00000978863060191 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per millisecond-to-bushel per hours factor of 102.15933573.
Simple example
1 cm3/ms × 102.1593357 = 102.1593357 bu/h
1 cubic centimeter per millisecond = 102.1593357 bushel per hours.
Real-world example
60 cm3/ms × 102.1593357 = 6,129.560144 bu/h
60 cubic centimeters per millisecond = 6,129.560144 bushel per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) | Bushel per Hours (bu/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/ms | 10.21593357 bu/h |
| 1 cm3/ms | 102.1593357 bu/h |
| 10 cm3/ms | 1,021.593357 bu/h |
| 60 cm3/ms | 6,129.560144 bu/h |
| 100 cm3/ms | 10,215.93357 bu/h |
| 1,000 cm3/ms | 102,159.3357 bu/h |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond
102.1593357 bu/h × 0.009788630602 = 0.9999999997 cm3/ms
102.1593357 bushel per hours = 0.9999999997 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
cubic centimeters per millisecond = bushel per hours × 0.00978863060191
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Hours (bu/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per hours are in 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond?
1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 102.1593357 bushel per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per millisecond to bushel per hours?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per millisecond value by 102.1593357. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per hours back to cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per hours equals 0.0097886306 cubic centimeters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per hours?
Bushel per Hours (bu/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per millisecond to bushel per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per millisecond and bushel per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 102.1593357 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.