Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Weeks Converter — cm3/ms to ft3/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) to Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per millisecond = 21,358.31043 cubic foot per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.001 / 4.68201829e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond and Cubic foot per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic foot per weeks = cubic centimeters per millisecond × 21358.3104332
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, and 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per millisecond-to-cubic foot per weeks factor of 21358.3104332.
Simple example
1 cm3/ms × 21358.31043 = 21,358.31043 ft3/wk
1 cubic centimeter per millisecond = 21,358.31043 cubic foot per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/ms × 21358.31043 = 1,281,498.626 ft3/wk
60 cubic centimeters per millisecond = 1,281,498.626 cubic foot per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) | Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/ms | 2,135.831043 ft3/wk |
| 1 cm3/ms | 21,358.31043 ft3/wk |
| 10 cm3/ms | 213,583.1043 ft3/wk |
| 60 cm3/ms | 1,281,498.626 ft3/wk |
| 100 cm3/ms | 2,135,831.043 ft3/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/ms | 21,358,310.43 ft3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond
1 ft3/wk × 0.00004682018286 = 0.0000468202 cm3/ms
1 cubic foot per weeks = 0.0000468202 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
cubic centimeters per millisecond = cubic foot per weeks × 0.0000468201828571
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic foot per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond?
1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 21,358.31043 cubic foot per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per millisecond to cubic foot per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per millisecond value by 21358.31043. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks back to cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 0.0000468202 cubic centimeters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per millisecond to cubic foot per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per millisecond and cubic foot per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 21358.31043 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.