Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond to Pint per Hours Converter — cm3/ms to pt/h
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) to Pint per Hours (pt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per millisecond = 7,608.155108 pint per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond to Pint per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.001 / 1.31437909e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond to Pint per Hours
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond and Pint per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
pint per hours = cubic centimeters per millisecond × 7608.15510791
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, and 1 pint per hours equals 1.314379e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per millisecond-to-pint per hours factor of 7608.15510791.
Simple example
1 cm3/ms × 7608.155108 = 7,608.155108 pt/h
1 cubic centimeter per millisecond = 7,608.155108 pint per hours.
Real-world example
60 cm3/ms × 7608.155108 = 456,489.3065 pt/h
60 cubic centimeters per millisecond = 456,489.3065 pint per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) | Pint per Hours (pt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/ms | 760.8155108 pt/h |
| 1 cm3/ms | 7,608.155108 pt/h |
| 10 cm3/ms | 76,081.55108 pt/h |
| 60 cm3/ms | 456,489.3065 pt/h |
| 100 cm3/ms | 760,815.5108 pt/h |
| 1,000 cm3/ms | 7,608,155.108 pt/h |
Reverse conversion: Pint per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond
1 pt/h × 0.0001314379092 = 0.0001314379 cm3/ms
1 pint per hours = 0.0001314379 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
cubic centimeters per millisecond = pint per hours × 0.000131437909167
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Pint per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Pint per Hours (pt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many pint per hours are in 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond?
1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 7,608.155108 pint per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per millisecond to pint per hours?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per millisecond value by 7608.155108. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert pint per hours back to cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 pint per hours equals 0.0001314379 cubic centimeters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a pint per hours?
Pint per Hours (pt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per millisecond to pint per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per millisecond and pint per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 7608.155108 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.