Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Deciliter per Weeks Converter — cm3/min to dL/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) to Deciliter per Weeks (dL/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per minutes = 100.8 deciliter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Deciliter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-8 / 1.65343915e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Deciliter per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes and Deciliter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
deciliter per weeks = cubic centimeter per minutes × 100.8
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-8 base units, and 1 deciliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per minutes-to-deciliter per weeks factor of 100.8.
Simple example
1 cm3/min × 100.8 = 100.8 dL/wk
1 cubic centimeter per minutes = 100.8 deciliter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/min × 100.8 = 6,048 dL/wk
60 cubic centimeter per minutes = 6,048 deciliter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) | Deciliter per Weeks (dL/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/min | 10.08 dL/wk |
| 1 cm3/min | 100.8 dL/wk |
| 10 cm3/min | 1,008 dL/wk |
| 60 cm3/min | 6,048 dL/wk |
| 100 cm3/min | 10,080 dL/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/min | 100,800 dL/wk |
Reverse conversion: Deciliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes
100.8 dL/wk × 0.009920634921 = 1 cm3/min
100.8 deciliter per weeks = 1 cubic centimeter per minutes.
cubic centimeter per minutes = deciliter per weeks × 0.00992063492063
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Deciliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Deciliter per Weeks (dL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many deciliter per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per minutes?
1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 100.8 deciliter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per minutes to deciliter per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per minutes value by 100.8. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert deciliter per weeks back to cubic centimeter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 deciliter per weeks equals 0.0099206349 cubic centimeter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per minutes?
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a deciliter per weeks?
Deciliter per Weeks (dL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per minutes to deciliter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per minutes and deciliter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 100.8 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.