Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Megaliter per Weeks Converter — cm3/min to ML/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) to Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per minutes = 0.00001008 megaliter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Megaliter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-8 / 0.001653439153.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Megaliter per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes and Megaliter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
megaliter per weeks = cubic centimeter per minutes × 0.00001008
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-8 base units, and 1 megaliter per weeks equals 0.00165343915344 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per minutes-to-megaliter per weeks factor of 0.00001008.
Simple example
1 cm3/min × 0.00001008 = 0.00001008 ML/wk
1 cubic centimeter per minutes = 0.00001008 megaliter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/min × 0.00001008 = 0.0006048 ML/wk
60 cubic centimeter per minutes = 0.0006048 megaliter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) | Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/min | 0.000001008 ML/wk |
| 1 cm3/min | 0.00001008 ML/wk |
| 10 cm3/min | 0.0001008 ML/wk |
| 60 cm3/min | 0.0006048 ML/wk |
| 100 cm3/min | 0.001008 ML/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/min | 0.01008 ML/wk |
Reverse conversion: Megaliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes
0.00001008 ML/wk × 99206.34921 = 1 cm3/min
0.00001008 megaliter per weeks = 1 cubic centimeter per minutes.
cubic centimeter per minutes = megaliter per weeks × 99206.3492063
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Megaliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many megaliter per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per minutes?
1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 0.00001008 megaliter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per minutes to megaliter per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per minutes value by 0.00001008. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert megaliter per weeks back to cubic centimeter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 megaliter per weeks equals 99,206.34921 cubic centimeter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per minutes?
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a megaliter per weeks?
Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per minutes to megaliter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per minutes and megaliter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00001008 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.