Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Microliter per Hours Converter — cm3/min to uL/h
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) to Microliter per Hours (uL/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per minutes = 60,000 microliter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Microliter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-8 / 2.77777778e-13.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Microliter per Hours
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes and Microliter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
microliter per hours = cubic centimeter per minutes × 60000
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-8 base units, and 1 microliter per hours equals 2.777778e-13 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per minutes-to-microliter per hours factor of 60000.
Simple example
1 cm3/min × 60000 = 60,000 uL/h
1 cubic centimeter per minutes = 60,000 microliter per hours.
Real-world example
60 cm3/min × 60000 = 3,600,000 uL/h
60 cubic centimeter per minutes = 3,600,000 microliter per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) | Microliter per Hours (uL/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/min | 6,000 uL/h |
| 1 cm3/min | 60,000 uL/h |
| 10 cm3/min | 600,000 uL/h |
| 60 cm3/min | 3,600,000 uL/h |
| 100 cm3/min | 6,000,000 uL/h |
| 1,000 cm3/min | 60,000,000 uL/h |
Reverse conversion: Microliter per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes
1 uL/h × 0.00001666666667 = 0.0000166667 cm3/min
1 microliter per hours = 0.0000166667 cubic centimeter per minutes.
cubic centimeter per minutes = microliter per hours × 0.0000166666666667
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Microliter per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Microliter per Hours (uL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many microliter per hours are in 1 cubic centimeter per minutes?
1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 60,000 microliter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per minutes to microliter per hours?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per minutes value by 60000. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert microliter per hours back to cubic centimeter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 microliter per hours equals 0.0000166667 cubic centimeter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per minutes?
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a microliter per hours?
Microliter per Hours (uL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per minutes to microliter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per minutes and microliter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 60000 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.