Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Microliter per Seconds Converter — cm3/min to uL/s
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) to Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per minutes = 16.66666667 microliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Microliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-8 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Microliter per Seconds
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes and Microliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
microliter per seconds = cubic centimeter per minutes × 16.6666666667
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-8 base units, and 1 microliter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per minutes-to-microliter per seconds factor of 16.6666666667.
Simple example
1 cm3/min × 16.66666667 = 16.66666667 uL/s
1 cubic centimeter per minutes = 16.66666667 microliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 cm3/min × 16.66666667 = 1,000 uL/s
60 cubic centimeter per minutes = 1,000 microliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) | Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/min | 1.666666667 uL/s |
| 1 cm3/min | 16.66666667 uL/s |
| 10 cm3/min | 166.6666667 uL/s |
| 60 cm3/min | 1,000 uL/s |
| 100 cm3/min | 1,666.666667 uL/s |
| 1,000 cm3/min | 16,666.66667 uL/s |
Reverse conversion: Microliter per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes
16.66666667 uL/s × 0.06 = 1 cm3/min
16.66666667 microliter per seconds = 1 cubic centimeter per minutes.
cubic centimeter per minutes = microliter per seconds × 0.06
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Microliter per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Microliter per Seconds (uL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many microliter per seconds are in 1 cubic centimeter per minutes?
1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 16.66666667 microliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per minutes to microliter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per minutes value by 16.66666667. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert microliter per seconds back to cubic centimeter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 microliter per seconds equals 0.06 cubic centimeter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per minutes?
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a microliter per seconds?
Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per minutes to microliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per minutes and microliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 16.66666667 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.