Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Centiliter per Hours Converter — cm3/s to cL/h

Convert Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) to Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 360 centiliter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Centiliter per Hours converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 360 centiliter per hours
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 1e-6 / 2.77777778e-9.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Centiliter per Hours

Cubic Centimeter per Seconds and Centiliter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

centiliter per hours = cubic centimeter per seconds × 360

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, and 1 centiliter per hours equals 2.777778e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per seconds-to-centiliter per hours factor of 360.

Simple example

1 cm3/s × 360 = 360 cL/h

1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 360 centiliter per hours.

Real-world example

60 cm3/s × 360 = 21,600 cL/h

60 cubic centimeter per seconds = 21,600 centiliter per hours.

Conversion table

Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)Centiliter per Hours (cL/h)
0.1 cm3/s36 cL/h
1 cm3/s360 cL/h
10 cm3/s3,600 cL/h
60 cm3/s21,600 cL/h
100 cm3/s36,000 cL/h
1,000 cm3/s360,000 cL/h

Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds

360 cL/h × 0.002777777778 = 1 cm3/s

360 centiliter per hours = 1 cubic centimeter per seconds.

cubic centimeter per seconds = centiliter per hours × 0.00277777777778

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds.

Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Centiliter per Hours (cL/h)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many centiliter per hours are in 1 cubic centimeter per seconds?

1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 360 centiliter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds to centiliter per hours?

Multiply the cubic centimeter per seconds value by 360. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert centiliter per hours back to cubic centimeter per seconds?

Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per hours equals 0.0027777778 cubic centimeter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?

Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a centiliter per hours?

Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the cubic centimeter per seconds to centiliter per hours conversion exact?

Yes. Both cubic centimeter per seconds and centiliter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 360 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.