Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks Converter — cm3/s to ft3/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) to Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 21.35831043 cubic foot per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-6 / 4.68201829e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Cubic foot per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds and Cubic foot per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic foot per weeks = cubic centimeter per seconds × 21.3583104332
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, and 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per seconds-to-cubic foot per weeks factor of 21.3583104332.
Simple example
1 cm3/s × 21.35831043 = 21.35831043 ft3/wk
1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 21.35831043 cubic foot per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/s × 21.35831043 = 1,281.498626 ft3/wk
60 cubic centimeter per seconds = 1,281.498626 cubic foot per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) | Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/s | 2.135831043 ft3/wk |
| 1 cm3/s | 21.35831043 ft3/wk |
| 10 cm3/s | 213.5831043 ft3/wk |
| 60 cm3/s | 1,281.498626 ft3/wk |
| 100 cm3/s | 2,135.831043 ft3/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/s | 21,358.31043 ft3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
21.35831043 ft3/wk × 0.04682018286 = 0.9999999999 cm3/s
21.35831043 cubic foot per weeks = 0.9999999999 cubic centimeter per seconds.
cubic centimeter per seconds = cubic foot per weeks × 0.0468201828571
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic foot per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per seconds?
1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 21.35831043 cubic foot per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds to cubic foot per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per seconds value by 21.35831043. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks back to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 0.0468201829 cubic centimeter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per seconds to cubic foot per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per seconds and cubic foot per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 21.35831043 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.