Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Cubic yard per Weeks Converter — cm3/s to yd3/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) to Cubic yard per Weeks (yd3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 0.7910485346 cubic yard per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Cubic yard per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-6 / 1.26414494e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Cubic yard per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds and Cubic yard per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yard per weeks = cubic centimeter per seconds × 0.791048534561
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, and 1 cubic yard per weeks equals 0.00000126414493714 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per seconds-to-cubic yard per weeks factor of 0.791048534561.
Simple example
1 cm3/s × 0.7910485346 = 0.7910485346 yd3/wk
1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 0.7910485346 cubic yard per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/s × 0.7910485346 = 47.46291207 yd3/wk
60 cubic centimeter per seconds = 47.46291207 cubic yard per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) | Cubic yard per Weeks (yd3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/s | 0.0791048535 yd3/wk |
| 1 cm3/s | 0.7910485346 yd3/wk |
| 10 cm3/s | 7.910485346 yd3/wk |
| 60 cm3/s | 47.46291207 yd3/wk |
| 100 cm3/s | 79.10485346 yd3/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/s | 791.0485346 yd3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
0.7910485346 yd3/wk × 1.264144937 = 1 cm3/s
0.7910485346 cubic yard per weeks = 1 cubic centimeter per seconds.
cubic centimeter per seconds = cubic yard per weeks × 1.26414493714
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Weeks (yd3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yard per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per seconds?
1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.7910485346 cubic yard per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds to cubic yard per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per seconds value by 0.7910485346. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per weeks back to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per weeks equals 1.264144937 cubic centimeter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per weeks?
Cubic yard per Weeks (yd3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per seconds to cubic yard per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per seconds and cubic yard per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.7910485346 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.