Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Kiloliters per Fortnight Converter — cm3/s to kL/fn
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) to Kiloliter per Fortnight (kL/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 1.2096 kiloliter per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Kiloliters per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-6 / 8.26719577e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Kiloliters per Fortnight
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds and Kiloliter per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
kiloliters per fortnight = cubic centimeter per seconds × 1.2096
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, and 1 kiloliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per seconds-to-kiloliter per fortnight factor of 1.2096.
Simple example
1 cm3/s × 1.2096 = 1.2096 kL/fn
1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 1.2096 kiloliters per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 cm3/s × 1.2096 = 72.576 kL/fn
60 cubic centimeter per seconds = 72.576 kiloliters per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) | Kiloliter per Fortnight (kL/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/s | 0.12096 kL/fn |
| 1 cm3/s | 1.2096 kL/fn |
| 10 cm3/s | 12.096 kL/fn |
| 60 cm3/s | 72.576 kL/fn |
| 100 cm3/s | 120.96 kL/fn |
| 1,000 cm3/s | 1,209.6 kL/fn |
Reverse conversion: Kiloliter per Fortnight to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
1.2096 kL/fn × 0.8267195767 = 1 cm3/s
1.2096 kiloliters per fortnight = 1 cubic centimeter per seconds.
cubic centimeter per seconds = kiloliters per fortnight × 0.82671957672
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Kiloliter per Fortnight to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Kiloliter per Fortnight (kL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many kiloliters per fortnight are in 1 cubic centimeter per seconds?
1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 1.2096 kiloliters per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds to kiloliter per fortnight?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per seconds value by 1.2096. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert kiloliter per fortnight back to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 kiloliter per fortnight equals 0.8267195767 cubic centimeter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a kiloliter per fortnight?
Kiloliter per Fortnight (kL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per seconds to kiloliter per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per seconds and kiloliter per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.2096 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.