Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Microliter per Minutes Converter — cm3/s to uL/min
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) to Microliter per Minutes (uL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 60,000 microliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Microliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-6 / 1.66666667e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Microliter per Minutes
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds and Microliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
microliter per minutes = cubic centimeter per seconds × 60000
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, and 1 microliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per seconds-to-microliter per minutes factor of 60000.
Simple example
1 cm3/s × 60000 = 60,000 uL/min
1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 60,000 microliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 cm3/s × 60000 = 3,600,000 uL/min
60 cubic centimeter per seconds = 3,600,000 microliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) | Microliter per Minutes (uL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/s | 6,000 uL/min |
| 1 cm3/s | 60,000 uL/min |
| 10 cm3/s | 600,000 uL/min |
| 60 cm3/s | 3,600,000 uL/min |
| 100 cm3/s | 6,000,000 uL/min |
| 1,000 cm3/s | 60,000,000 uL/min |
Reverse conversion: Microliter per Minutes to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
1 uL/min × 0.00001666666667 = 0.0000166667 cm3/s
1 microliter per minutes = 0.0000166667 cubic centimeter per seconds.
cubic centimeter per seconds = microliter per minutes × 0.0000166666666667
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Microliter per Minutes to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Microliter per Minutes (uL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many microliter per minutes are in 1 cubic centimeter per seconds?
1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 60,000 microliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds to microliter per minutes?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per seconds value by 60000. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert microliter per minutes back to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 microliter per minutes equals 0.0000166667 cubic centimeter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a microliter per minutes?
Microliter per Minutes (uL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per seconds to microliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per seconds and microliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 60000 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.