Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Milliliters per Millisecond Converter — cm3/s to mL/ms
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) to Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 0.001 milliliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Milliliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-6 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Milliliters per Millisecond
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds and Milliliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliters per millisecond = cubic centimeter per seconds × 0.001
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, and 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per seconds-to-milliliter per millisecond factor of 0.001.
Simple example
1 cm3/s × 0.001 = 0.001 mL/ms
1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 0.001 milliliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 cm3/s × 0.001 = 0.06 mL/ms
60 cubic centimeter per seconds = 0.06 milliliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) | Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/s | 0.0001 mL/ms |
| 1 cm3/s | 0.001 mL/ms |
| 10 cm3/s | 0.01 mL/ms |
| 60 cm3/s | 0.06 mL/ms |
| 100 cm3/s | 0.1 mL/ms |
| 1,000 cm3/s | 1 mL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Millisecond to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
0.001 mL/ms × 1000 = 1 cm3/s
0.001 milliliters per millisecond = 1 cubic centimeter per seconds.
cubic centimeter per seconds = milliliters per millisecond × 1000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Millisecond to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliters per millisecond are in 1 cubic centimeter per seconds?
1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.001 milliliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds to milliliter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per seconds value by 0.001. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per millisecond back to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 1,000 cubic centimeter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per millisecond?
Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per seconds to milliliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per seconds and milliliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.001 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.