Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Bushels per Millisecond Converter — cm3/wk to bu/ms
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 4.692062e-14 bushel per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Bushels per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 35.23907017.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Bushels per Millisecond
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Bushel per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushels per millisecond = cubic centimeter per weeks × 4.692062e-14
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 bushel per millisecond equals 35.2390701669 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-bushel per millisecond factor of 4.692062e-14.
Simple example
1 cm3/wk × 4.692062e-14 = 4.692062e-14 bu/ms
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 4.692062e-14 bushels per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 cm3/wk × 4.692062e-14 = 2.815237e-12 bu/ms
60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 2.815237e-12 bushels per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) | Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/wk | 4.692062e-15 bu/ms |
| 1 cm3/wk | 4.692062e-14 bu/ms |
| 10 cm3/wk | 4.692062e-13 bu/ms |
| 60 cm3/wk | 2.815237e-12 bu/ms |
| 100 cm3/wk | 4.692062e-12 bu/ms |
| 1,000 cm3/wk | 4.692062e-11 bu/ms |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Millisecond to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
4.692062e-14 bu/ms × 2.131259e+13 = 0.9999999196 cm3/wk
4.692062e-14 bushels per millisecond = 0.9999999196 cubic centimeter per weeks.
cubic centimeter per weeks = bushels per millisecond × 2.131259e+13
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Millisecond to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushels per millisecond are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?
1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 4.692062e-14 bushels per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to bushel per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 4.692062e-14. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per millisecond back to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per millisecond equals 2.131259e+13 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per millisecond?
Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to bushel per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and bushel per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 4.692062e-14 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.