Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Bushel per Weeks Converter — cm3/wk to bu/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000283776 bushel per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Bushel per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 5.82656583e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Bushel per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Bushel per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per weeks = cubic centimeter per weeks × 0.0000283775932584
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 bushel per weeks equals 5.826566e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-bushel per weeks factor of 0.0000283775932584.
Simple example
1 cm3/wk × 0.00002837759326 = 0.0000283776 bu/wk
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000283776 bushel per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/wk × 0.00002837759326 = 0.0017026556 bu/wk
60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0017026556 bushel per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) | Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/wk | 0.0000028378 bu/wk |
| 1 cm3/wk | 0.0000283776 bu/wk |
| 10 cm3/wk | 0.0002837759 bu/wk |
| 60 cm3/wk | 0.0017026556 bu/wk |
| 100 cm3/wk | 0.0028377593 bu/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/wk | 0.0283775933 bu/wk |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
0.0000283776 bu/wk × 35239.07017 = 1.000000238 cm3/wk
0.0000283776 bushel per weeks = 1.000000238 cubic centimeter per weeks.
cubic centimeter per weeks = bushel per weeks × 35239.0701669
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?
1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 0.0000283776 bushel per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to bushel per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 0.00002837759326. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per weeks back to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per weeks equals 35,239.07017 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per weeks?
Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to bushel per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and bushel per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00002837759326 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.