Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Cubic foot per Weeks Converter — cm3/wk to ft3/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000353147 cubic foot per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Cubic foot per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 4.68201829e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Cubic foot per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Cubic foot per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic foot per weeks = cubic centimeter per weeks × 0.0000353146667215
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 4.682018e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-cubic foot per weeks factor of 0.0000353146667215.
Simple example
1 cm3/wk × 0.00003531466672 = 0.0000353147 ft3/wk
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000353147 cubic foot per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/wk × 0.00003531466672 = 0.00211888 ft3/wk
60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.00211888 cubic foot per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) | Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/wk | 0.0000035315 ft3/wk |
| 1 cm3/wk | 0.0000353147 ft3/wk |
| 10 cm3/wk | 0.0003531467 ft3/wk |
| 60 cm3/wk | 0.00211888 ft3/wk |
| 100 cm3/wk | 0.0035314667 ft3/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/wk | 0.0353146667 ft3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
0.0000353147 ft3/wk × 28316.84659 = 1.000000942 cm3/wk
0.0000353147 cubic foot per weeks = 1.000000942 cubic centimeter per weeks.
cubic centimeter per weeks = cubic foot per weeks × 28316.846592
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic foot per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?
1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 0.0000353147 cubic foot per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to cubic foot per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 0.00003531466672. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per weeks back to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per weeks equals 28,316.84659 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per weeks?
Cubic foot per Weeks (ft3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to cubic foot per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and cubic foot per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00003531466672 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.