Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Cubic inch per Hours Converter — cm3/wk to in3/h
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Cubic inch per Hours (in3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0003632366 cubic inch per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Cubic inch per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 4.55196222e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Cubic inch per Hours
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Cubic inch per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inch per hours = cubic centimeter per weeks × 0.000363236571992
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 cubic inch per hours equals 4.551962e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-cubic inch per hours factor of 0.000363236571992.
Simple example
1 cm3/wk × 0.000363236572 = 0.0003632366 in3/h
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0003632366 cubic inch per hours.
Real-world example
60 cm3/wk × 0.000363236572 = 0.0217941943 in3/h
60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0217941943 cubic inch per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) | Cubic inch per Hours (in3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/wk | 0.0000363237 in3/h |
| 1 cm3/wk | 0.0003632366 in3/h |
| 10 cm3/wk | 0.0036323657 in3/h |
| 60 cm3/wk | 0.0217941943 in3/h |
| 100 cm3/wk | 0.0363236572 in3/h |
| 1,000 cm3/wk | 0.363236572 in3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
0.0003632366 in3/h × 2753.026752 = 1.000000077 cm3/wk
0.0003632366 cubic inch per hours = 1.000000077 cubic centimeter per weeks.
cubic centimeter per weeks = cubic inch per hours × 2753.026752
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Hours (in3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inch per hours are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?
1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 0.0003632366 cubic inch per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to cubic inch per hours?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 0.000363236572. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per hours back to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per hours equals 2,753.026752 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per hours?
Cubic inch per Hours (in3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to cubic inch per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and cubic inch per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000363236572 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.