Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Cubic yard per Years Converter — cm3/wk to yd3/yr
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000682456 cubic yard per years). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Cubic yard per Years converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 2.4227779e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Cubic yard per Years
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Cubic yard per Years both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yard per years = cubic centimeter per weeks × 0.0000682455934393
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 cubic yard per years equals 2.422778e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-cubic yard per years factor of 0.0000682455934393.
Simple example
1 cm3/wk × 0.00006824559344 = 0.0000682456 yd3/yr
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000682456 cubic yard per years.
Real-world example
60 cm3/wk × 0.00006824559344 = 0.0040947356 yd3/yr
60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0040947356 cubic yard per years.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) | Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/wk | 0.0000068246 yd3/yr |
| 1 cm3/wk | 0.0000682456 yd3/yr |
| 10 cm3/wk | 0.0006824559 yd3/yr |
| 60 cm3/wk | 0.0040947356 yd3/yr |
| 100 cm3/wk | 0.0068245593 yd3/yr |
| 1,000 cm3/wk | 0.0682455934 yd3/yr |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Years to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
0.0000682456 yd3/yr × 14652.96072 = 1.000000096 cm3/wk
0.0000682456 cubic yard per years = 1.000000096 cubic centimeter per weeks.
cubic centimeter per weeks = cubic yard per years × 14652.9607203
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Years to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yard per years are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?
1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 0.0000682456 cubic yard per years, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to cubic yard per years?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 0.00006824559344. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per years back to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per years equals 14,652.96072 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per years?
Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to cubic yard per years conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and cubic yard per years are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00006824559344 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.