Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Metric cup per Hours Converter — cm3/wk to metric cup/h
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Metric cup per Hours (metric cup/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000238095 metric cup per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Metric cup per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 6.94444444e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Metric cup per Hours
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Metric cup per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric cup per hours = cubic centimeter per weeks × 0.0000238095238095
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 metric cup per hours equals 6.944444e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-metric cup per hours factor of 0.0000238095238095.
Simple example
1 cm3/wk × 0.00002380952381 = 0.0000238095 metric cup/h
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000238095 metric cup per hours.
Real-world example
60 cm3/wk × 0.00002380952381 = 0.0014285714 metric cup/h
60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0014285714 metric cup per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) | Metric cup per Hours (metric cup/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/wk | 0.000002381 metric cup/h |
| 1 cm3/wk | 0.0000238095 metric cup/h |
| 10 cm3/wk | 0.0002380952 metric cup/h |
| 60 cm3/wk | 0.0014285714 metric cup/h |
| 100 cm3/wk | 0.0023809524 metric cup/h |
| 1,000 cm3/wk | 0.0238095238 metric cup/h |
Reverse conversion: Metric cup per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
0.0000238095 metric cup/h × 42000 = 0.999999 cm3/wk
0.0000238095 metric cup per hours = 0.999999 cubic centimeter per weeks.
cubic centimeter per weeks = metric cup per hours × 42000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric cup per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric cup per Hours (metric cup/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric cup per hours are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?
1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 0.0000238095 metric cup per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to metric cup per hours?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 0.00002380952381. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric cup per hours back to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric cup per hours equals 42,000 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric cup per hours?
Metric cup per Hours (metric cup/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to metric cup per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and metric cup per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00002380952381 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.