Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Cup per Minutes Converter — cm3/wk to cup/min
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Cup per Minutes (cup/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 4.193207e-7 cup per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Cup per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 3.94313728e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Cup per Minutes
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Cup per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cup per minutes = cubic centimeter per weeks × 4.193207e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 cup per minutes equals 0.000003943137275 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-cup per minutes factor of 4.193207e-7.
Simple example
1 cm3/wk × 4.193207e-7 = 4.193207e-7 cup/min
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 4.193207e-7 cup per minutes.
Real-world example
60 cm3/wk × 4.193207e-7 = 0.0000251592 cup/min
60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000251592 cup per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) | Cup per Minutes (cup/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/wk | 4.193207e-8 cup/min |
| 1 cm3/wk | 4.193207e-7 cup/min |
| 10 cm3/wk | 0.0000041932 cup/min |
| 60 cm3/wk | 0.0000251592 cup/min |
| 100 cm3/wk | 0.0000419321 cup/min |
| 1,000 cm3/wk | 0.0004193207 cup/min |
Reverse conversion: Cup per Minutes to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
4.193207e-7 cup/min × 2384809.424 = 0.999999957 cm3/wk
4.193207e-7 cup per minutes = 0.999999957 cubic centimeter per weeks.
cubic centimeter per weeks = cup per minutes × 2384809.42392
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cup per Minutes to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cup per Minutes (cup/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cup per minutes are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?
1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 4.193207e-7 cup per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to cup per minutes?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 4.193207e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cup per minutes back to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cup per minutes equals 2,384,809.424 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cup per minutes?
Cup per Minutes (cup/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to cup per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and cup per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 4.193207e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.