Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Decaliter per Hours Converter — cm3/wk to daL/h
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Decaliter per Hours (daL/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 5.952381e-7 decaliter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Decaliter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 2.77777778e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Decaliter per Hours
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Decaliter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
decaliter per hours = cubic centimeter per weeks × 5.952381e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 decaliter per hours equals 0.00000277777777778 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-decaliter per hours factor of 5.952381e-7.
Simple example
1 cm3/wk × 5.952381e-7 = 5.952381e-7 daL/h
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 5.952381e-7 decaliter per hours.
Real-world example
60 cm3/wk × 5.952381e-7 = 0.0000357143 daL/h
60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000357143 decaliter per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) | Decaliter per Hours (daL/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/wk | 5.952381e-8 daL/h |
| 1 cm3/wk | 5.952381e-7 daL/h |
| 10 cm3/wk | 0.0000059524 daL/h |
| 60 cm3/wk | 0.0000357143 daL/h |
| 100 cm3/wk | 0.0000595238 daL/h |
| 1,000 cm3/wk | 0.0005952381 daL/h |
Reverse conversion: Decaliter per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
5.952381e-7 daL/h × 1680000 = 1.000000008 cm3/wk
5.952381e-7 decaliter per hours = 1.000000008 cubic centimeter per weeks.
cubic centimeter per weeks = decaliter per hours × 1680000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Decaliter per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Decaliter per Hours (daL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many decaliter per hours are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?
1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 5.952381e-7 decaliter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to decaliter per hours?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 5.952381e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert decaliter per hours back to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 decaliter per hours equals 1,680,000 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a decaliter per hours?
Decaliter per Hours (daL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to decaliter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and decaliter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 5.952381e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.