Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Deciliter per Minutes Converter — cm3/wk to dL/min
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Deciliter per Minutes (dL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 9.920635e-7 deciliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Deciliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 1.66666667e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Deciliter per Minutes
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Deciliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
deciliter per minutes = cubic centimeter per weeks × 9.920635e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 deciliter per minutes equals 0.00000166666666667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-deciliter per minutes factor of 9.920635e-7.
Simple example
1 cm3/wk × 9.920635e-7 = 9.920635e-7 dL/min
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 9.920635e-7 deciliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 cm3/wk × 9.920635e-7 = 0.0000595238 dL/min
60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000595238 deciliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) | Deciliter per Minutes (dL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/wk | 9.920635e-8 dL/min |
| 1 cm3/wk | 9.920635e-7 dL/min |
| 10 cm3/wk | 0.0000099206 dL/min |
| 60 cm3/wk | 0.0000595238 dL/min |
| 100 cm3/wk | 0.0000992063 dL/min |
| 1,000 cm3/wk | 0.0009920635 dL/min |
Reverse conversion: Deciliter per Minutes to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
9.920635e-7 dL/min × 1008000 = 1.000000008 cm3/wk
9.920635e-7 deciliter per minutes = 1.000000008 cubic centimeter per weeks.
cubic centimeter per weeks = deciliter per minutes × 1008000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Deciliter per Minutes to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Deciliter per Minutes (dL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many deciliter per minutes are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?
1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 9.920635e-7 deciliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to deciliter per minutes?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 9.920635e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert deciliter per minutes back to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 deciliter per minutes equals 1,008,000 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a deciliter per minutes?
Deciliter per Minutes (dL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to deciliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and deciliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 9.920635e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.