Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Gallon per Decades Converter — cm3/wk to gal/decade
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Gallon per Decades (gal/decade) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.1378383726 gallon per decades). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Gallon per Decades converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 1.19954924e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Gallon per Decades
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Gallon per Decades both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
gallon per decades = cubic centimeter per weeks × 0.137838372619
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 gallon per decades equals 1.199549e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-gallon per decades factor of 0.137838372619.
Simple example
1 cm3/wk × 0.1378383726 = 0.1378383726 gal/decade
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.1378383726 gallon per decades.
Real-world example
60 cm3/wk × 0.1378383726 = 8.270302357 gal/decade
60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 8.270302357 gallon per decades.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) | Gallon per Decades (gal/decade) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/wk | 0.0137838373 gal/decade |
| 1 cm3/wk | 0.1378383726 gal/decade |
| 10 cm3/wk | 1.378383726 gal/decade |
| 60 cm3/wk | 8.270302357 gal/decade |
| 100 cm3/wk | 13.78383726 gal/decade |
| 1,000 cm3/wk | 137.8383726 gal/decade |
Reverse conversion: Gallon per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
0.1378383726 gal/decade × 7.254873813 = 0.9999999999 cm3/wk
0.1378383726 gallon per decades = 0.9999999999 cubic centimeter per weeks.
cubic centimeter per weeks = gallon per decades × 7.25487381343
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Gallon per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Gallon per Decades (gal/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many gallon per decades are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?
1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 0.1378383726 gallon per decades, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to gallon per decades?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 0.1378383726. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert gallon per decades back to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 gallon per decades equals 7.254873813 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a gallon per decades?
Gallon per Decades (gal/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to gallon per decades conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and gallon per decades are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.1378383726 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.