Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Milliliter per Hours Converter — cm3/wk to mL/h
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.005952381 milliliter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Milliliter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 2.77777778e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Milliliter per Hours
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Milliliter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per hours = cubic centimeter per weeks × 0.00595238095238
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 milliliter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-milliliter per hours factor of 0.00595238095238.
Simple example
1 cm3/wk × 0.005952380952 = 0.005952381 mL/h
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.005952381 milliliter per hours.
Real-world example
60 cm3/wk × 0.005952380952 = 0.3571428571 mL/h
60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.3571428571 milliliter per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) | Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/wk | 0.0005952381 mL/h |
| 1 cm3/wk | 0.005952381 mL/h |
| 10 cm3/wk | 0.0595238095 mL/h |
| 60 cm3/wk | 0.3571428571 mL/h |
| 100 cm3/wk | 0.5952380952 mL/h |
| 1,000 cm3/wk | 5.952380952 mL/h |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
0.005952381 mL/h × 168 = 1.000000008 cm3/wk
0.005952381 milliliter per hours = 1.000000008 cubic centimeter per weeks.
cubic centimeter per weeks = milliliter per hours × 168
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Hours (mL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per hours are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?
1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 0.005952381 milliliter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to milliliter per hours?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 0.005952380952. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per hours back to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per hours equals 168 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per hours?
Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to milliliter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and milliliter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.005952380952 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.