Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Milliliter per Minutes Converter — cm3/wk to mL/min
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000992063 milliliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Milliliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 1.66666667e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Milliliter per Minutes
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Milliliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per minutes = cubic centimeter per weeks × 0.0000992063492063
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 milliliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-milliliter per minutes factor of 0.0000992063492063.
Simple example
1 cm3/wk × 0.00009920634921 = 0.0000992063 mL/min
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000992063 milliliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 cm3/wk × 0.00009920634921 = 0.005952381 mL/min
60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.005952381 milliliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) | Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/wk | 0.0000099206 mL/min |
| 1 cm3/wk | 0.0000992063 mL/min |
| 10 cm3/wk | 0.0009920635 mL/min |
| 60 cm3/wk | 0.005952381 mL/min |
| 100 cm3/wk | 0.0099206349 mL/min |
| 1,000 cm3/wk | 0.0992063492 mL/min |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Minutes to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
0.0000992063 mL/min × 10080 = 0.999999504 cm3/wk
0.0000992063 milliliter per minutes = 0.999999504 cubic centimeter per weeks.
cubic centimeter per weeks = milliliter per minutes × 10080
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Minutes to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per minutes are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?
1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 0.0000992063 milliliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to milliliter per minutes?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 0.00009920634921. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per minutes back to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per minutes equals 10,080 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per minutes?
Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to milliliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and milliliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00009920634921 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.