Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Milliliter per Seconds Converter — cm3/wk to mL/s
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000016534 milliliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Milliliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Milliliter per Seconds
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Milliliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per seconds = cubic centimeter per weeks × 0.00000165343915344
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-milliliter per seconds factor of 0.00000165343915344.
Simple example
1 cm3/wk × 0.000001653439153 = 0.0000016534 mL/s
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000016534 milliliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 cm3/wk × 0.000001653439153 = 0.0000992063 mL/s
60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000992063 milliliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) | Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/wk | 1.653439e-7 mL/s |
| 1 cm3/wk | 0.0000016534 mL/s |
| 10 cm3/wk | 0.0000165344 mL/s |
| 60 cm3/wk | 0.0000992063 mL/s |
| 100 cm3/wk | 0.0001653439 mL/s |
| 1,000 cm3/wk | 0.0016534392 mL/s |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
0.0000016534 mL/s × 604800 = 0.99997632 cm3/wk
0.0000016534 milliliter per seconds = 0.99997632 cubic centimeter per weeks.
cubic centimeter per weeks = milliliter per seconds × 604800
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per seconds are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?
1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 0.0000016534 milliliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to milliliter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 0.000001653439153. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per seconds back to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 604,800 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per seconds?
Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to milliliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and milliliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000001653439153 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.