Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Pint per Minutes Converter — cm3/wk to pt/min
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Pint per Minutes (pt/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 2.096604e-7 pint per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Pint per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 7.88627455e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Pint per Minutes
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Pint per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
pint per minutes = cubic centimeter per weeks × 2.096604e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 pint per minutes equals 0.00000788627455 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-pint per minutes factor of 2.096604e-7.
Simple example
1 cm3/wk × 2.096604e-7 = 2.096604e-7 pt/min
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 2.096604e-7 pint per minutes.
Real-world example
60 cm3/wk × 2.096604e-7 = 0.0000125796 pt/min
60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000125796 pint per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) | Pint per Minutes (pt/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/wk | 2.096604e-8 pt/min |
| 1 cm3/wk | 2.096604e-7 pt/min |
| 10 cm3/wk | 0.0000020966 pt/min |
| 60 cm3/wk | 0.0000125796 pt/min |
| 100 cm3/wk | 0.000020966 pt/min |
| 1,000 cm3/wk | 0.0002096604 pt/min |
Reverse conversion: Pint per Minutes to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
2.096604e-7 pt/min × 4769618.848 = 1.000000195 cm3/wk
2.096604e-7 pint per minutes = 1.000000195 cubic centimeter per weeks.
cubic centimeter per weeks = pint per minutes × 4769618.84784
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Pint per Minutes to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Pint per Minutes (pt/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many pint per minutes are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?
1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 2.096604e-7 pint per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to pint per minutes?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 2.096604e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert pint per minutes back to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 pint per minutes equals 4,769,618.848 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a pint per minutes?
Pint per Minutes (pt/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to pint per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and pint per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.096604e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.