Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Quarts per Fortnight Converter — cm3/wk to qt/fn
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Quart per Fortnight (qt/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0021133764 quart per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Quarts per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 7.82368507e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Quarts per Fortnight
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Quart per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
quarts per fortnight = cubic centimeter per weeks × 0.00211337641887
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 quart per fortnight equals 7.823685e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-quart per fortnight factor of 0.00211337641887.
Simple example
1 cm3/wk × 0.002113376419 = 0.0021133764 qt/fn
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0021133764 quarts per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 cm3/wk × 0.002113376419 = 0.1268025851 qt/fn
60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.1268025851 quarts per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) | Quart per Fortnight (qt/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/wk | 0.0002113376 qt/fn |
| 1 cm3/wk | 0.0021133764 qt/fn |
| 10 cm3/wk | 0.0211337642 qt/fn |
| 60 cm3/wk | 0.1268025851 qt/fn |
| 100 cm3/wk | 0.2113376419 qt/fn |
| 1,000 cm3/wk | 2.113376419 qt/fn |
Reverse conversion: Quart per Fortnight to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
0.0021133764 qt/fn × 473.176473 = 0.9999999911 cm3/wk
0.0021133764 quarts per fortnight = 0.9999999911 cubic centimeter per weeks.
cubic centimeter per weeks = quarts per fortnight × 473.176473
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Quart per Fortnight to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Quart per Fortnight (qt/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many quarts per fortnight are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?
1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 0.0021133764 quarts per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to quart per fortnight?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 0.002113376419. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert quart per fortnight back to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 quart per fortnight equals 473.176473 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a quart per fortnight?
Quart per Fortnight (qt/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to quart per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and quart per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.002113376419 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.