Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Quart per Hours Converter — cm3/wk to qt/h

Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Quart per Hours (qt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000062898 quart per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Quart per Hours converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000062898 quart per hours
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 2.62875818e-7.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Quart per Hours

Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Quart per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

quart per hours = cubic centimeter per weeks × 0.00000628981077043

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 quart per hours equals 2.628758e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-quart per hours factor of 0.00000628981077043.

Simple example

1 cm3/wk × 0.00000628981077 = 0.0000062898 qt/h

1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0000062898 quart per hours.

Real-world example

60 cm3/wk × 0.00000628981077 = 0.0003773886 qt/h

60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0003773886 quart per hours.

Conversion table

Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)Quart per Hours (qt/h)
0.1 cm3/wk6.289811e-7 qt/h
1 cm3/wk0.0000062898 qt/h
10 cm3/wk0.0000628981 qt/h
60 cm3/wk0.0003773886 qt/h
100 cm3/wk0.0006289811 qt/h
1,000 cm3/wk0.0062898108 qt/h

Reverse conversion: Quart per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks

0.0000062898 qt/h × 158987.2949 = 0.9999982876 cm3/wk

0.0000062898 quart per hours = 0.9999982876 cubic centimeter per weeks.

cubic centimeter per weeks = quart per hours × 158987.294928

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Quart per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.

Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Quart per Hours (qt/h)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many quart per hours are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?

1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 0.0000062898 quart per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to quart per hours?

Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 0.00000628981077. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert quart per hours back to cubic centimeter per weeks?

Use the reverse factor: 1 quart per hours equals 158,987.2949 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?

Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a quart per hours?

Quart per Hours (qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to quart per hours conversion exact?

Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and quart per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00000628981077 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.