Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Teaspoon per Hours Converter — cm3/wk to tsp/h
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) to Teaspoon per Hours (tsp/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0012076437 teaspoon per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Teaspoon per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 1.36914489e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Teaspoon per Hours
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks and Teaspoon per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
teaspoon per hours = cubic centimeter per weeks × 0.00120764366792
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 teaspoon per hours equals 1.369145e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per weeks-to-teaspoon per hours factor of 0.00120764366792.
Simple example
1 cm3/wk × 0.001207643668 = 0.0012076437 tsp/h
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0012076437 teaspoon per hours.
Real-world example
60 cm3/wk × 0.001207643668 = 0.0724586201 tsp/h
60 cubic centimeter per weeks = 0.0724586201 teaspoon per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) | Teaspoon per Hours (tsp/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/wk | 0.0001207644 tsp/h |
| 1 cm3/wk | 0.0012076437 tsp/h |
| 10 cm3/wk | 0.0120764367 tsp/h |
| 60 cm3/wk | 0.0724586201 tsp/h |
| 100 cm3/wk | 0.1207643668 tsp/h |
| 1,000 cm3/wk | 1.207643668 tsp/h |
Reverse conversion: Teaspoon per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
0.0012076437 tsp/h × 828.0588277 = 1.000000027 cm3/wk
0.0012076437 teaspoon per hours = 1.000000027 cubic centimeter per weeks.
cubic centimeter per weeks = teaspoon per hours × 828.05882775
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Teaspoon per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Hours (tsp/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many teaspoon per hours are in 1 cubic centimeter per weeks?
1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 0.0012076437 teaspoon per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks to teaspoon per hours?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per weeks value by 0.001207643668. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert teaspoon per hours back to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 teaspoon per hours equals 828.0588277 cubic centimeter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a teaspoon per hours?
Teaspoon per Hours (tsp/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per weeks to teaspoon per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per weeks and teaspoon per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.001207643668 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.