Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Years to Cubic foot per Hours Converter — cm3/yr to ft3/h
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Years (cm3/yr) to Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per years = 4.028678e-9 cubic foot per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Years to Cubic foot per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-14 / 7.86579072e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Years to Cubic foot per Hours
Cubic Centimeter per Years and Cubic foot per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic foot per hours = cubic centimeter per years × 4.028678e-9
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per years equals 3.168874e-14 base units, and 1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.00000786579072 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per years-to-cubic foot per hours factor of 4.028678e-9.
Simple example
1 cm3/yr × 4.028678e-9 = 4.028678e-9 ft3/h
1 cubic centimeter per years = 4.028678e-9 cubic foot per hours.
Real-world example
60 cm3/yr × 4.028678e-9 = 2.417207e-7 ft3/h
60 cubic centimeter per years = 2.417207e-7 cubic foot per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Years (cm3/yr) | Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/yr | 4.028678e-10 ft3/h |
| 1 cm3/yr | 4.028678e-9 ft3/h |
| 10 cm3/yr | 4.028678e-8 ft3/h |
| 60 cm3/yr | 2.417207e-7 ft3/h |
| 100 cm3/yr | 4.028678e-7 ft3/h |
| 1,000 cm3/yr | 0.0000040287 ft3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Years
4.028678e-9 ft3/h × 248220380.2 = 0.9999999848 cm3/yr
4.028678e-9 cubic foot per hours = 0.9999999848 cubic centimeter per years.
cubic centimeter per years = cubic foot per hours × 248220380.193
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Years.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Years (cm3/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic foot per hours are in 1 cubic centimeter per years?
1 cubic centimeter per years equals 4.028678e-9 cubic foot per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per years to cubic foot per hours?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per years value by 4.028678e-9. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per hours back to cubic centimeter per years?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per hours equals 248,220,380.2 cubic centimeter per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per years?
Cubic Centimeter per Years (cm3/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per hours?
Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per years to cubic foot per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per years and cubic foot per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 4.028678e-9 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.