Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Years to Quart per Weeks Converter — cm3/yr to qt/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Years (cm3/yr) to Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per years = 0.0000202518 quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Years to Quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-14 / 1.56473701e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Years to Quart per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Years and Quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
quart per weeks = cubic centimeter per years × 0.0000202517983697
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per years equals 3.168874e-14 base units, and 1 quart per weeks equals 1.564737e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per years-to-quart per weeks factor of 0.0000202517983697.
Simple example
1 cm3/yr × 0.00002025179837 = 0.0000202518 qt/wk
1 cubic centimeter per years = 0.0000202518 quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/yr × 0.00002025179837 = 0.0012151079 qt/wk
60 cubic centimeter per years = 0.0012151079 quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Years (cm3/yr) | Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/yr | 0.0000020252 qt/wk |
| 1 cm3/yr | 0.0000202518 qt/wk |
| 10 cm3/yr | 0.000202518 qt/wk |
| 60 cm3/yr | 0.0012151079 qt/wk |
| 100 cm3/yr | 0.0020251798 qt/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/yr | 0.0202517984 qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Quart per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Years
0.0000202518 qt/wk × 49378.33084 = 1.000000081 cm3/yr
0.0000202518 quart per weeks = 1.000000081 cubic centimeter per years.
cubic centimeter per years = quart per weeks × 49378.3308399
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Quart per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Years.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Years (cm3/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Quart per Weeks (qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many quart per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per years?
1 cubic centimeter per years equals 0.0000202518 quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per years to quart per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per years value by 0.00002025179837. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert quart per weeks back to cubic centimeter per years?
Use the reverse factor: 1 quart per weeks equals 49,378.33084 cubic centimeter per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per years?
Cubic Centimeter per Years (cm3/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a quart per weeks?
Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per years to quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per years and quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00002025179837 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.