Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Years to Teaspoon per Weeks Converter — cm3/yr to tsp/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Years (cm3/yr) to Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per years = 0.0038883453 teaspoon per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Years to Teaspoon per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-14 / 8.14967195e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Years to Teaspoon per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Years and Teaspoon per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
teaspoon per weeks = cubic centimeter per years × 0.00388834528697
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per years equals 3.168874e-14 base units, and 1 teaspoon per weeks equals 8.149672e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per years-to-teaspoon per weeks factor of 0.00388834528697.
Simple example
1 cm3/yr × 0.003888345287 = 0.0038883453 tsp/wk
1 cubic centimeter per years = 0.0038883453 teaspoon per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/yr × 0.003888345287 = 0.2333007172 tsp/wk
60 cubic centimeter per years = 0.2333007172 teaspoon per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Years (cm3/yr) | Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/yr | 0.0003888345 tsp/wk |
| 1 cm3/yr | 0.0038883453 tsp/wk |
| 10 cm3/yr | 0.0388834529 tsp/wk |
| 60 cm3/yr | 0.2333007172 tsp/wk |
| 100 cm3/yr | 0.3888345287 tsp/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/yr | 3.888345287 tsp/wk |
Reverse conversion: Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Years
0.0038883453 tsp/wk × 257.1788065 = 1.000000003 cm3/yr
0.0038883453 teaspoon per weeks = 1.000000003 cubic centimeter per years.
cubic centimeter per years = teaspoon per weeks × 257.178806458
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Years.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Years (cm3/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many teaspoon per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per years?
1 cubic centimeter per years equals 0.0038883453 teaspoon per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per years to teaspoon per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per years value by 0.003888345287. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert teaspoon per weeks back to cubic centimeter per years?
Use the reverse factor: 1 teaspoon per weeks equals 257.1788065 cubic centimeter per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per years?
Cubic Centimeter per Years (cm3/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a teaspoon per weeks?
Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per years to teaspoon per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per years and teaspoon per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.003888345287 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.