Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Days to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes Converter — ft3/d to mm3/min
Convert Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d) to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per days = 19,664.4768 cubic millimeter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Days to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.2774128e-7 / 1.66666667e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Days to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
Cubic foot per Days and Cubic Millimeter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per minutes = cubic foot per days × 19664.4768
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per days equals 3.277413e-7 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per days-to-cubic millimeter per minutes factor of 19664.4768.
Simple example
1 ft3/d × 19664.4768 = 19,664.4768 mm3/min
1 cubic foot per days = 19,664.4768 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 ft3/d × 19664.4768 = 1,179,868.608 mm3/min
60 cubic foot per days = 1,179,868.608 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d) | Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/d | 1,966.44768 mm3/min |
| 1 ft3/d | 19,664.4768 mm3/min |
| 10 ft3/d | 196,644.768 mm3/min |
| 60 ft3/d | 1,179,868.608 mm3/min |
| 100 ft3/d | 1,966,447.68 mm3/min |
| 1,000 ft3/d | 19,664,476.8 mm3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Cubic foot per Days
1 mm3/min × 0.00005085312008 = 0.0000508531 ft3/d
1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 0.0000508531 cubic foot per days.
cubic foot per days = cubic millimeter per minutes × 0.0000508531200789
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Cubic foot per Days.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per minutes are in 1 cubic foot per days?
1 cubic foot per days equals 19,664.4768 cubic millimeter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per days to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Multiply the cubic foot per days value by 19664.4768. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes back to cubic foot per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 0.0000508531 cubic foot per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per days?
Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per days to cubic millimeter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per days and cubic millimeter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 19664.4768 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.