Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Days to Milliliters per Millisecond Converter — ft3/d to mL/ms
Convert Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d) to Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per days = 0.0003277413 milliliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Days to Milliliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.2774128e-7 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Days to Milliliters per Millisecond
Cubic foot per Days and Milliliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliters per millisecond = cubic foot per days × 0.00032774128
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per days equals 3.277413e-7 base units, and 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per days-to-milliliter per millisecond factor of 0.00032774128.
Simple example
1 ft3/d × 0.00032774128 = 0.0003277413 mL/ms
1 cubic foot per days = 0.0003277413 milliliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ft3/d × 0.00032774128 = 0.0196644768 mL/ms
60 cubic foot per days = 0.0196644768 milliliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d) | Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/d | 0.0000327741 mL/ms |
| 1 ft3/d | 0.0003277413 mL/ms |
| 10 ft3/d | 0.0032774128 mL/ms |
| 60 ft3/d | 0.0196644768 mL/ms |
| 100 ft3/d | 0.032774128 mL/ms |
| 1,000 ft3/d | 0.32774128 mL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Days
0.0003277413 mL/ms × 3051.187205 = 1.000000061 ft3/d
0.0003277413 milliliters per millisecond = 1.000000061 cubic foot per days.
cubic foot per days = milliliters per millisecond × 3051.18720474
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Days.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliters per millisecond are in 1 cubic foot per days?
1 cubic foot per days equals 0.0003277413 milliliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per days to milliliter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic foot per days value by 0.00032774128. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per millisecond back to cubic foot per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 3,051.187205 cubic foot per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per days?
Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per millisecond?
Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per days to milliliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per days and milliliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00032774128 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.