Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Days to Metric teaspoon per Seconds Converter — ft3/d to metric tsp/s
Convert Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d) to Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per days = 0.065548256 metric teaspoon per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Days to Metric teaspoon per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.2774128e-7 / 5e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Days to Metric teaspoon per Seconds
Cubic foot per Days and Metric teaspoon per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per seconds = cubic foot per days × 0.065548256
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per days equals 3.277413e-7 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per seconds equals 0.000005 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per days-to-metric teaspoon per seconds factor of 0.065548256.
Simple example
1 ft3/d × 0.065548256 = 0.065548256 metric tsp/s
1 cubic foot per days = 0.065548256 metric teaspoon per seconds.
Real-world example
60 ft3/d × 0.065548256 = 3.93289536 metric tsp/s
60 cubic foot per days = 3.93289536 metric teaspoon per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d) | Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/d | 0.0065548256 metric tsp/s |
| 1 ft3/d | 0.065548256 metric tsp/s |
| 10 ft3/d | 0.65548256 metric tsp/s |
| 60 ft3/d | 3.93289536 metric tsp/s |
| 100 ft3/d | 6.5548256 metric tsp/s |
| 1,000 ft3/d | 65.548256 metric tsp/s |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Seconds to Cubic foot per Days
0.065548256 metric tsp/s × 15.25593602 = 1 ft3/d
0.065548256 metric teaspoon per seconds = 1 cubic foot per days.
cubic foot per days = metric teaspoon per seconds × 15.2559360237
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Seconds to Cubic foot per Days.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per seconds are in 1 cubic foot per days?
1 cubic foot per days equals 0.065548256 metric teaspoon per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per days to metric teaspoon per seconds?
Multiply the cubic foot per days value by 0.065548256. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per seconds back to cubic foot per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per seconds equals 15.25593602 cubic foot per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per days?
Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per seconds?
Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per days to metric teaspoon per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per days and metric teaspoon per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.065548256 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.