Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Days to Metric teaspoon per Years Converter — ft3/d to metric tsp/yr
Convert Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d) to Metric teaspoon per Years (metric tsp/yr) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per days = 2,068,503.168 metric teaspoon per years). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Days to Metric teaspoon per Years converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.2774128e-7 / 1.58443693e-13.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Days to Metric teaspoon per Years
Cubic foot per Days and Metric teaspoon per Years both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per years = cubic foot per days × 2068503.16828
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per days equals 3.277413e-7 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per years equals 1.584437e-13 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per days-to-metric teaspoon per years factor of 2068503.16828.
Simple example
1 ft3/d × 2068503.168 = 2,068,503.168 metric tsp/yr
1 cubic foot per days = 2,068,503.168 metric teaspoon per years.
Real-world example
60 ft3/d × 2068503.168 = 124,110,190.1 metric tsp/yr
60 cubic foot per days = 124,110,190.1 metric teaspoon per years.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d) | Metric teaspoon per Years (metric tsp/yr) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/d | 206,850.3168 metric tsp/yr |
| 1 ft3/d | 2,068,503.168 metric tsp/yr |
| 10 ft3/d | 20,685,031.68 metric tsp/yr |
| 60 ft3/d | 124,110,190.1 metric tsp/yr |
| 100 ft3/d | 206,850,316.8 metric tsp/yr |
| 1,000 ft3/d | 2,068,503,168 metric tsp/yr |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Years to Cubic foot per Days
1 metric tsp/yr × 4.834414e-7 = 4.834414e-7 ft3/d
1 metric teaspoon per years = 4.834414e-7 cubic foot per days.
cubic foot per days = metric teaspoon per years × 4.834414e-7
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Years to Cubic foot per Days.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Years (metric tsp/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per years are in 1 cubic foot per days?
1 cubic foot per days equals 2,068,503.168 metric teaspoon per years, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per days to metric teaspoon per years?
Multiply the cubic foot per days value by 2068503.168. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per years back to cubic foot per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per years equals 4.834414e-7 cubic foot per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per days?
Cubic foot per Days (ft3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per years?
Metric teaspoon per Years (metric tsp/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per days to metric teaspoon per years conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per days and metric teaspoon per years are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2068503.168 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.