Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Decades to Centiliter per Minutes Converter — ft3/decade to cL/min
Convert Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) to Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per decades = 0.0005383951 centiliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Decades to Centiliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.97325147e-11 / 1.66666667e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Decades to Centiliter per Minutes
Cubic foot per Decades and Centiliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per minutes = cubic foot per decades × 0.000538395088195
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per decades equals 8.973251e-11 base units, and 1 centiliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per decades-to-centiliter per minutes factor of 0.000538395088195.
Simple example
1 ft3/decade × 0.0005383950882 = 0.0005383951 cL/min
1 cubic foot per decades = 0.0005383951 centiliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 ft3/decade × 0.0005383950882 = 0.0323037053 cL/min
60 cubic foot per decades = 0.0323037053 centiliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) | Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/decade | 0.0000538395 cL/min |
| 1 ft3/decade | 0.0005383951 cL/min |
| 10 ft3/decade | 0.0053839509 cL/min |
| 60 ft3/decade | 0.0323037053 cL/min |
| 100 ft3/decade | 0.0538395088 cL/min |
| 1,000 ft3/decade | 0.5383950882 cL/min |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Minutes to Cubic foot per Decades
0.0005383951 cL/min × 1857.372071 = 1.000000022 ft3/decade
0.0005383951 centiliter per minutes = 1.000000022 cubic foot per decades.
cubic foot per decades = centiliter per minutes × 1857.37207104
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Minutes to Cubic foot per Decades.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per minutes are in 1 cubic foot per decades?
1 cubic foot per decades equals 0.0005383951 centiliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per decades to centiliter per minutes?
Multiply the cubic foot per decades value by 0.0005383950882. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per minutes back to cubic foot per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per minutes equals 1,857.372071 cubic foot per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per decades?
Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per minutes?
Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per decades to centiliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per decades and centiliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0005383950882 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.