Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Decades to Centiliter per Seconds Converter — ft3/decade to cL/s
Convert Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) to Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per decades = 0.0000089733 centiliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Decades to Centiliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.97325147e-11 / 1e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Decades to Centiliter per Seconds
Cubic foot per Decades and Centiliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per seconds = cubic foot per decades × 0.00000897325146991
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per decades equals 8.973251e-11 base units, and 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per decades-to-centiliter per seconds factor of 0.00000897325146991.
Simple example
1 ft3/decade × 0.00000897325147 = 0.0000089733 cL/s
1 cubic foot per decades = 0.0000089733 centiliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 ft3/decade × 0.00000897325147 = 0.0005383951 cL/s
60 cubic foot per decades = 0.0005383951 centiliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) | Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/decade | 8.973251e-7 cL/s |
| 1 ft3/decade | 0.0000089733 cL/s |
| 10 ft3/decade | 0.0000897325 cL/s |
| 60 ft3/decade | 0.0005383951 cL/s |
| 100 ft3/decade | 0.0008973251 cL/s |
| 1,000 ft3/decade | 0.0089732515 cL/s |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic foot per Decades
0.0000089733 cL/s × 111442.3243 = 1.000005408 ft3/decade
0.0000089733 centiliter per seconds = 1.000005408 cubic foot per decades.
cubic foot per decades = centiliter per seconds × 111442.324263
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic foot per Decades.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per seconds are in 1 cubic foot per decades?
1 cubic foot per decades equals 0.0000089733 centiliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per decades to centiliter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic foot per decades value by 0.00000897325147. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds back to cubic foot per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 111,442.3243 cubic foot per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per decades?
Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per decades to centiliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per decades and centiliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00000897325147 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.