Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Decades to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds Converter — ft3/decade to mm3/s
Convert Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per decades = 0.0897325147 cubic millimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Decades to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.97325147e-11 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Decades to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
Cubic foot per Decades and Cubic Millimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per seconds = cubic foot per decades × 0.0897325146991
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per decades equals 8.973251e-11 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per decades-to-cubic millimeter per seconds factor of 0.0897325146991.
Simple example
1 ft3/decade × 0.0897325147 = 0.0897325147 mm3/s
1 cubic foot per decades = 0.0897325147 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 ft3/decade × 0.0897325147 = 5.383950882 mm3/s
60 cubic foot per decades = 5.383950882 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) | Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/decade | 0.0089732515 mm3/s |
| 1 ft3/decade | 0.0897325147 mm3/s |
| 10 ft3/decade | 0.897325147 mm3/s |
| 60 ft3/decade | 5.383950882 mm3/s |
| 100 ft3/decade | 8.97325147 mm3/s |
| 1,000 ft3/decade | 89.7325147 mm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Cubic foot per Decades
0.0897325147 mm3/s × 11.14423243 = 1 ft3/decade
0.0897325147 cubic millimeter per seconds = 1 cubic foot per decades.
cubic foot per decades = cubic millimeter per seconds × 11.1442324263
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Cubic foot per Decades.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per seconds are in 1 cubic foot per decades?
1 cubic foot per decades equals 0.0897325147 cubic millimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per decades to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic foot per decades value by 0.0897325147. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds back to cubic foot per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 11.14423243 cubic foot per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per decades?
Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per decades to cubic millimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per decades and cubic millimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0897325147 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.