Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Decades to Cubic yard per Seconds Converter — ft3/decade to yd3/s
Convert Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) to Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per decades = 1.173657e-10 cubic yard per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Decades to Cubic yard per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.97325147e-11 / 0.764554858.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Decades to Cubic yard per Seconds
Cubic foot per Decades and Cubic yard per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yard per seconds = cubic foot per decades × 1.173657e-10
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per decades equals 8.973251e-11 base units, and 1 cubic yard per seconds equals 0.764554857984 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per decades-to-cubic yard per seconds factor of 1.173657e-10.
Simple example
1 ft3/decade × 1.173657e-10 = 1.173657e-10 yd3/s
1 cubic foot per decades = 1.173657e-10 cubic yard per seconds.
Real-world example
60 ft3/decade × 1.173657e-10 = 7.041942e-9 yd3/s
60 cubic foot per decades = 7.041942e-9 cubic yard per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) | Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/decade | 1.173657e-11 yd3/s |
| 1 ft3/decade | 1.173657e-10 yd3/s |
| 10 ft3/decade | 1.173657e-9 yd3/s |
| 60 ft3/decade | 7.041942e-9 yd3/s |
| 100 ft3/decade | 1.173657e-8 yd3/s |
| 1,000 ft3/decade | 1.173657e-7 yd3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Seconds to Cubic foot per Decades
1.173657e-10 yd3/s × 8520377040 = 1.000000016 ft3/decade
1.173657e-10 cubic yard per seconds = 1.000000016 cubic foot per decades.
cubic foot per decades = cubic yard per seconds × 8520377040
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Seconds to Cubic foot per Decades.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yard per seconds are in 1 cubic foot per decades?
1 cubic foot per decades equals 1.173657e-10 cubic yard per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per decades to cubic yard per seconds?
Multiply the cubic foot per decades value by 1.173657e-10. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per seconds back to cubic foot per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per seconds equals 8,520,377,040 cubic foot per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per decades?
Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per seconds?
Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per decades to cubic yard per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per decades and cubic yard per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.173657e-10 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.