Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Decades to Cubic yard per Years Converter — ft3/decade to yd3/yr
Convert Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) to Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per decades = 0.0037037037 cubic yard per years). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Decades to Cubic yard per Years converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.97325147e-11 / 2.4227779e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Decades to Cubic yard per Years
Cubic foot per Decades and Cubic yard per Years both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yard per years = cubic foot per decades × 0.0037037037037
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per decades equals 8.973251e-11 base units, and 1 cubic yard per years equals 2.422778e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per decades-to-cubic yard per years factor of 0.0037037037037.
Simple example
1 ft3/decade × 0.003703703704 = 0.0037037037 yd3/yr
1 cubic foot per decades = 0.0037037037 cubic yard per years.
Real-world example
60 ft3/decade × 0.003703703704 = 0.2222222222 yd3/yr
60 cubic foot per decades = 0.2222222222 cubic yard per years.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) | Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/decade | 0.0003703704 yd3/yr |
| 1 ft3/decade | 0.0037037037 yd3/yr |
| 10 ft3/decade | 0.037037037 yd3/yr |
| 60 ft3/decade | 0.2222222222 yd3/yr |
| 100 ft3/decade | 0.3703703704 yd3/yr |
| 1,000 ft3/decade | 3.703703704 yd3/yr |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Years to Cubic foot per Decades
0.0037037037 yd3/yr × 270 = 0.999999999 ft3/decade
0.0037037037 cubic yard per years = 0.999999999 cubic foot per decades.
cubic foot per decades = cubic yard per years × 270
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Years to Cubic foot per Decades.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yard per years are in 1 cubic foot per decades?
1 cubic foot per decades equals 0.0037037037 cubic yard per years, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per decades to cubic yard per years?
Multiply the cubic foot per decades value by 0.003703703704. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per years back to cubic foot per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per years equals 270 cubic foot per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per decades?
Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per years?
Cubic yard per Years (yd3/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per decades to cubic yard per years conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per decades and cubic yard per years are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.003703703704 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.