Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Decades to Deciliter per Minutes Converter — ft3/decade to dL/min
Convert Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) to Deciliter per Minutes (dL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per decades = 0.0000538395 deciliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Decades to Deciliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.97325147e-11 / 1.66666667e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Decades to Deciliter per Minutes
Cubic foot per Decades and Deciliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
deciliter per minutes = cubic foot per decades × 0.0000538395088195
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per decades equals 8.973251e-11 base units, and 1 deciliter per minutes equals 0.00000166666666667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per decades-to-deciliter per minutes factor of 0.0000538395088195.
Simple example
1 ft3/decade × 0.00005383950882 = 0.0000538395 dL/min
1 cubic foot per decades = 0.0000538395 deciliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 ft3/decade × 0.00005383950882 = 0.0032303705 dL/min
60 cubic foot per decades = 0.0032303705 deciliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) | Deciliter per Minutes (dL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/decade | 0.000005384 dL/min |
| 1 ft3/decade | 0.0000538395 dL/min |
| 10 ft3/decade | 0.0005383951 dL/min |
| 60 ft3/decade | 0.0032303705 dL/min |
| 100 ft3/decade | 0.0053839509 dL/min |
| 1,000 ft3/decade | 0.0538395088 dL/min |
Reverse conversion: Deciliter per Minutes to Cubic foot per Decades
0.0000538395 dL/min × 18573.72071 = 0.9999998362 ft3/decade
0.0000538395 deciliter per minutes = 0.9999998362 cubic foot per decades.
cubic foot per decades = deciliter per minutes × 18573.7207104
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Deciliter per Minutes to Cubic foot per Decades.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Deciliter per Minutes (dL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many deciliter per minutes are in 1 cubic foot per decades?
1 cubic foot per decades equals 0.0000538395 deciliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per decades to deciliter per minutes?
Multiply the cubic foot per decades value by 0.00005383950882. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert deciliter per minutes back to cubic foot per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 deciliter per minutes equals 18,573.72071 cubic foot per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per decades?
Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a deciliter per minutes?
Deciliter per Minutes (dL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per decades to deciliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per decades and deciliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00005383950882 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.