Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Decades to Fluid ounce per Seconds Converter — ft3/decade to fl oz/s
Convert Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) to Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per decades = 0.0000030342 fluid ounce per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Decades to Fluid ounce per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.97325147e-11 / 2.95735296e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Decades to Fluid ounce per Seconds
Cubic foot per Decades and Fluid ounce per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounce per seconds = cubic foot per decades × 0.00000303421728913
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per decades equals 8.973251e-11 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per seconds equals 0.0000295735295625 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per decades-to-fluid ounce per seconds factor of 0.00000303421728913.
Simple example
1 ft3/decade × 0.000003034217289 = 0.0000030342 fl oz/s
1 cubic foot per decades = 0.0000030342 fluid ounce per seconds.
Real-world example
60 ft3/decade × 0.000003034217289 = 0.000182053 fl oz/s
60 cubic foot per decades = 0.000182053 fluid ounce per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) | Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/decade | 3.034217e-7 fl oz/s |
| 1 ft3/decade | 0.0000030342 fl oz/s |
| 10 ft3/decade | 0.0000303422 fl oz/s |
| 60 ft3/decade | 0.000182053 fl oz/s |
| 100 ft3/decade | 0.0003034217 fl oz/s |
| 1,000 ft3/decade | 0.0030342173 fl oz/s |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Seconds to Cubic foot per Decades
0.0000030342 fl oz/s × 329574.2871 = 0.9999943019 ft3/decade
0.0000030342 fluid ounce per seconds = 0.9999943019 cubic foot per decades.
cubic foot per decades = fluid ounce per seconds × 329574.287109
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Seconds to Cubic foot per Decades.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounce per seconds are in 1 cubic foot per decades?
1 cubic foot per decades equals 0.0000030342 fluid ounce per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per decades to fluid ounce per seconds?
Multiply the cubic foot per decades value by 0.000003034217289. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per seconds back to cubic foot per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per seconds equals 329,574.2871 cubic foot per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per decades?
Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per seconds?
Fluid ounce per Seconds (fl oz/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per decades to fluid ounce per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per decades and fluid ounce per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000003034217289 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.