Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Decades to Milliliter per Seconds Converter — ft3/decade to mL/s
Convert Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) to Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per decades = 0.0000897325 milliliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Decades to Milliliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.97325147e-11 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Decades to Milliliter per Seconds
Cubic foot per Decades and Milliliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per seconds = cubic foot per decades × 0.0000897325146991
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per decades equals 8.973251e-11 base units, and 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per decades-to-milliliter per seconds factor of 0.0000897325146991.
Simple example
1 ft3/decade × 0.0000897325147 = 0.0000897325 mL/s
1 cubic foot per decades = 0.0000897325 milliliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 ft3/decade × 0.0000897325147 = 0.0053839509 mL/s
60 cubic foot per decades = 0.0053839509 milliliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) | Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/decade | 0.0000089733 mL/s |
| 1 ft3/decade | 0.0000897325 mL/s |
| 10 ft3/decade | 0.0008973251 mL/s |
| 60 ft3/decade | 0.0053839509 mL/s |
| 100 ft3/decade | 0.0089732515 mL/s |
| 1,000 ft3/decade | 0.0897325147 mL/s |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic foot per Decades
0.0000897325 mL/s × 11144.23243 = 0.9999998362 ft3/decade
0.0000897325 milliliter per seconds = 0.9999998362 cubic foot per decades.
cubic foot per decades = milliliter per seconds × 11144.2324263
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic foot per Decades.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per seconds are in 1 cubic foot per decades?
1 cubic foot per decades equals 0.0000897325 milliliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per decades to milliliter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic foot per decades value by 0.0000897325147. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per seconds back to cubic foot per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 11,144.23243 cubic foot per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per decades?
Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per seconds?
Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per decades to milliliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per decades and milliliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0000897325147 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.