Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic foot per Decades to Imperial pint per Days Converter — ft3/decade to imp pt/d
Convert Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) to Imperial pint per Days (imp pt/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per decades = 0.0136431778 imperial pint per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic foot per Decades to Imperial pint per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.97325147e-11 / 6.5770978e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic foot per Decades to Imperial pint per Days
Cubic foot per Decades and Imperial pint per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial pint per days = cubic foot per decades × 0.013643177799
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per decades equals 8.973251e-11 base units, and 1 imperial pint per days equals 6.577098e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per decades-to-imperial pint per days factor of 0.013643177799.
Simple example
1 ft3/decade × 0.0136431778 = 0.0136431778 imp pt/d
1 cubic foot per decades = 0.0136431778 imperial pint per days.
Real-world example
60 ft3/decade × 0.0136431778 = 0.8185906679 imp pt/d
60 cubic foot per decades = 0.8185906679 imperial pint per days.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) | Imperial pint per Days (imp pt/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/decade | 0.0013643178 imp pt/d |
| 1 ft3/decade | 0.0136431778 imp pt/d |
| 10 ft3/decade | 0.136431778 imp pt/d |
| 60 ft3/decade | 0.8185906679 imp pt/d |
| 100 ft3/decade | 1.36431778 imp pt/d |
| 1,000 ft3/decade | 13.6431778 imp pt/d |
Reverse conversion: Imperial pint per Days to Cubic foot per Decades
0.0136431778 imp pt/d × 73.29670658 = 1 ft3/decade
0.0136431778 imperial pint per days = 1 cubic foot per decades.
cubic foot per decades = imperial pint per days × 73.2967065838
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial pint per Days to Cubic foot per Decades.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Days (imp pt/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial pint per days are in 1 cubic foot per decades?
1 cubic foot per decades equals 0.0136431778 imperial pint per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per decades to imperial pint per days?
Multiply the cubic foot per decades value by 0.0136431778. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial pint per days back to cubic foot per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial pint per days equals 73.29670658 cubic foot per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per decades?
Cubic foot per Decades (ft3/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial pint per days?
Imperial pint per Days (imp pt/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per decades to imperial pint per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per decades and imperial pint per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0136431778 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.