Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic feet per Fortnight to Megaliters per Fortnight Converter — ft3/fn to ML/fn
Convert Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) to Megaliter per Fortnight (ML/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per fortnight = 0.0000283168 megaliter per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic feet per Fortnight to Megaliters per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.34100914e-8 / 0.0008267195767.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic feet per Fortnight to Megaliters per Fortnight
Cubic foot per Fortnight and Megaliter per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
megaliters per fortnight = cubic feet per fortnight × 0.000028316846592
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per fortnight equals 2.341009e-8 base units, and 1 megaliter per fortnight equals 0.00082671957672 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per fortnight-to-megaliter per fortnight factor of 0.000028316846592.
Simple example
1 ft3/fn × 0.00002831684659 = 0.0000283168 ML/fn
1 cubic foot per fortnight = 0.0000283168 megaliters per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 ft3/fn × 0.00002831684659 = 0.0016990108 ML/fn
60 cubic feet per fortnight = 0.0016990108 megaliters per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) | Megaliter per Fortnight (ML/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/fn | 0.0000028317 ML/fn |
| 1 ft3/fn | 0.0000283168 ML/fn |
| 10 ft3/fn | 0.0002831685 ML/fn |
| 60 ft3/fn | 0.0016990108 ML/fn |
| 100 ft3/fn | 0.0028316847 ML/fn |
| 1,000 ft3/fn | 0.0283168466 ML/fn |
Reverse conversion: Megaliter per Fortnight to Cubic foot per Fortnight
0.0000283168 ML/fn × 35314.66672 = 0.9999983546 ft3/fn
0.0000283168 megaliters per fortnight = 0.9999983546 cubic feet per fortnight.
cubic feet per fortnight = megaliters per fortnight × 35314.6667215
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Megaliter per Fortnight to Cubic foot per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Megaliter per Fortnight (ML/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many megaliters per fortnight are in 1 cubic foot per fortnight?
1 cubic foot per fortnight equals 0.0000283168 megaliters per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per fortnight to megaliter per fortnight?
Multiply the cubic foot per fortnight value by 0.00002831684659. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert megaliter per fortnight back to cubic foot per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 megaliter per fortnight equals 35,314.66672 cubic feet per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per fortnight?
Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a megaliter per fortnight?
Megaliter per Fortnight (ML/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per fortnight to megaliter per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per fortnight and megaliter per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00002831684659 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.