Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic feet per Fortnight to Megaliter per Weeks Converter — ft3/fn to ML/wk
Convert Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) to Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per fortnight = 0.0000141584 megaliter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic feet per Fortnight to Megaliter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.34100914e-8 / 0.001653439153.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic feet per Fortnight to Megaliter per Weeks
Cubic foot per Fortnight and Megaliter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
megaliter per weeks = cubic feet per fortnight × 0.000014158423296
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per fortnight equals 2.341009e-8 base units, and 1 megaliter per weeks equals 0.00165343915344 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per fortnight-to-megaliter per weeks factor of 0.000014158423296.
Simple example
1 ft3/fn × 0.0000141584233 = 0.0000141584 ML/wk
1 cubic foot per fortnight = 0.0000141584 megaliter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 ft3/fn × 0.0000141584233 = 0.0008495054 ML/wk
60 cubic feet per fortnight = 0.0008495054 megaliter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) | Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/fn | 0.0000014158 ML/wk |
| 1 ft3/fn | 0.0000141584 ML/wk |
| 10 ft3/fn | 0.0001415842 ML/wk |
| 60 ft3/fn | 0.0008495054 ML/wk |
| 100 ft3/fn | 0.0014158423 ML/wk |
| 1,000 ft3/fn | 0.0141584233 ML/wk |
Reverse conversion: Megaliter per Weeks to Cubic foot per Fortnight
0.0000141584 ML/wk × 70629.33344 = 0.9999983546 ft3/fn
0.0000141584 megaliter per weeks = 0.9999983546 cubic feet per fortnight.
cubic feet per fortnight = megaliter per weeks × 70629.333443
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Megaliter per Weeks to Cubic foot per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many megaliter per weeks are in 1 cubic foot per fortnight?
1 cubic foot per fortnight equals 0.0000141584 megaliter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per fortnight to megaliter per weeks?
Multiply the cubic foot per fortnight value by 0.0000141584233. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert megaliter per weeks back to cubic foot per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 megaliter per weeks equals 70,629.33344 cubic feet per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per fortnight?
Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a megaliter per weeks?
Megaliter per Weeks (ML/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per fortnight to megaliter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per fortnight and megaliter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0000141584233 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.