Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic feet per Fortnight to Milliliters per Millisecond Converter — ft3/fn to mL/ms
Convert Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) to Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per fortnight = 0.0000234101 milliliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic feet per Fortnight to Milliliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.34100914e-8 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic feet per Fortnight to Milliliters per Millisecond
Cubic foot per Fortnight and Milliliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliters per millisecond = cubic feet per fortnight × 0.0000234100914286
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per fortnight equals 2.341009e-8 base units, and 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per fortnight-to-milliliter per millisecond factor of 0.0000234100914286.
Simple example
1 ft3/fn × 0.00002341009143 = 0.0000234101 mL/ms
1 cubic foot per fortnight = 0.0000234101 milliliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 ft3/fn × 0.00002341009143 = 0.0014046055 mL/ms
60 cubic feet per fortnight = 0.0014046055 milliliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) | Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/fn | 0.000002341 mL/ms |
| 1 ft3/fn | 0.0000234101 mL/ms |
| 10 ft3/fn | 0.0002341009 mL/ms |
| 60 ft3/fn | 0.0014046055 mL/ms |
| 100 ft3/fn | 0.0023410091 mL/ms |
| 1,000 ft3/fn | 0.0234100914 mL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Fortnight
0.0000234101 mL/ms × 42716.62087 = 1.000000366 ft3/fn
0.0000234101 milliliters per millisecond = 1.000000366 cubic feet per fortnight.
cubic feet per fortnight = milliliters per millisecond × 42716.6208663
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Millisecond to Cubic foot per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliters per millisecond are in 1 cubic foot per fortnight?
1 cubic foot per fortnight equals 0.0000234101 milliliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per fortnight to milliliter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic foot per fortnight value by 0.00002341009143. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per millisecond back to cubic foot per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 42,716.62087 cubic feet per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per fortnight?
Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per millisecond?
Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per fortnight to milliliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per fortnight and milliliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00002341009143 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.