Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic feet per Fortnight to Milliliter per Seconds Converter — ft3/fn to mL/s
Convert Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) to Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic foot per fortnight = 0.0234100914 milliliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic feet per Fortnight to Milliliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.34100914e-8 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic feet per Fortnight to Milliliter per Seconds
Cubic foot per Fortnight and Milliliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per seconds = cubic feet per fortnight × 0.0234100914286
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic foot per fortnight equals 2.341009e-8 base units, and 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic foot per fortnight-to-milliliter per seconds factor of 0.0234100914286.
Simple example
1 ft3/fn × 0.02341009143 = 0.0234100914 mL/s
1 cubic foot per fortnight = 0.0234100914 milliliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 ft3/fn × 0.02341009143 = 1.404605486 mL/s
60 cubic feet per fortnight = 1.404605486 milliliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) | Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ft3/fn | 0.0023410091 mL/s |
| 1 ft3/fn | 0.0234100914 mL/s |
| 10 ft3/fn | 0.2341009143 mL/s |
| 60 ft3/fn | 1.404605486 mL/s |
| 100 ft3/fn | 2.341009143 mL/s |
| 1,000 ft3/fn | 23.41009143 mL/s |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic foot per Fortnight
0.0234100914 mL/s × 42.71662087 = 0.9999999988 ft3/fn
0.0234100914 milliliter per seconds = 0.9999999988 cubic feet per fortnight.
cubic feet per fortnight = milliliter per seconds × 42.7166208663
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic foot per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per seconds are in 1 cubic foot per fortnight?
1 cubic foot per fortnight equals 0.0234100914 milliliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic foot per fortnight to milliliter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic foot per fortnight value by 0.02341009143. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per seconds back to cubic foot per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 42.71662087 cubic feet per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic foot per fortnight?
Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per seconds?
Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic foot per fortnight to milliliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic foot per fortnight and milliliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.02341009143 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.